Alternative ways to introduce resuscitation at the prehospital stage in emergency conditions

Annotation. Objective – carrying out a comparative assessment of the advantages and disadvantages intravenous (IV) intraosseous (IO) resuscitation, which are used by emergency teams in Vinnytsia region. The work statistical data Regional Center for Emergency Medical Care Disaster Medicine period 2019-2021, carry through content analysis domestic foreign scientific sources, applied biblio-semantic, analytical, methods studying use cases. According to three years 2019-2021. we observe low percentage access 0,2% - 0,1%, respectively. In event an accident patient's condition “without changes” total 786 injections were carried both intravenously intraosseously. 2019, number, non-infusion therapy was performed 71,0% male patients 11,1% female patients, 11,2% intraosseously only patients. Compared 2020, 0,3% (2 patients) 2021, no resuscitation at all. state “deterioration” during (road accident, etc.) 87,5% men 12,5% women injected with drugs intravenously; 50% males females infused underwent never performed, provided that worsened. And “death presence” occurred 2019 88,8% (of 77,7% women) 11.2 VC (males); 2020 88,9% 72,2% 16,7% 1 article); 65,0% 25,0% women, while patient received access. case sudden illness, as follows: performed. infusion 3,4%; 3,8%; 2021 1,9%. Thus, method has several undeniable compared one, but Ukraine, it is little practice mobile medical syringe gun (connector BLG), considering age characteristics: adults (blue) children (red color) prescribed fundamental algorithms clinical/modern protocols treatment circulatory arrest due insufficient practical theoretical skills personnel teams. care gave impetus conducting classes future doctors master reduce prehospital early hospital mortality complement fixation reactions.